Logistics chains have finally adapted quickly to the new configuration of the container shipping market resulting from the Houthi attacks on vessels in the Red Sea. The return to the old Cape of Good Hope route as an alternative to the Suez Canal has become a sort of new norm.
The rise in freight rates has provoked some fears but has remained sufficiently limited to allow the shipping companies to avoid being accused again of contributing to inflation. Even the environmental aberration represented by the massive diversion of container carriers round the cape has not provoked any special reaction, despite the climate emergency in which we currently find ourselves.
Everything is happening as if a point of balance has been reached between the shipping companies, who are making money again, and the shippers, who are bearing additional costs, which, ultimately, are not unreasonable.
The only big loser seems to be Egypt. Even if the Suez Canal is continuing to handle close to 50% of its usual tonnage, its revenues are about 60% down, according to our estimates. The container carriers, which are now transiting in great numbers round the Cape of Good Hope have a high taxable value. If the situation persists, Egypt's revenue losses could rise to $6 billion on the basis of annual revenues of around $10 billion prior to the start of the Houthi attacks. In addition to these direct losses, there are indirect losses, given that there are now less containers transiting through Port Said and Damietta. One can estimate that this represents a further loss of about $1 billion.
The situation created by the Houthi attacks is temporarily camouflaging the colossal overcapacity which is currently developing on the container shipping market. We are even seeing some pressure this spring on access to capacity aboard ships departing from Asia.
The artificial bubble which has thus been created could burst, however, in the second half of 2024 or, at the latest, in the first half of 2025. If the Houthi threat disappeared overnight, allowing use of the Suez Canal to resume, we would risk seeing freight rates suffer a real collapse, combined with a big increase in canal tolls to cover the months of lost revenues. This would result in a major deterioration in shipping companies' operating accounts.
Sooner or later, in any case, the reopening of the strategic trading route that is the Suez Canal is inevitable.
It is not in the interests of Western economies to allow the Houthi threat to persist, with the risk of seeing it spread, as was exemplified by the capture of the MSC Aries close to the Strait of Hormuz. The sequestration of a giant vessel and its cargo worth close to $1 billion is an event which is not acceptable to the international trading community in general or to the container shipping industry in particular.
Setting aside the Western economies, China, too, urgently needs international trade to return to normal, as it undergoes the first big economic crisis in its recent history. East-West economic questions are sensitive and strategic in nature. They cannot, therefore, be allowed to be "polluted" for very long by regional disruption. China called for an end to attacks on civilian vessels in the Red Sea and for safe navigation in the area, when Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi met his Yemeni counterpart in Beijing on 28 May.
With the Iranian executive, which supports the Houthis, destabilised by the helicopter crash which led to the death of President Ebrahim Raïssi and foreign minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, a reduction in the scale of the Houthi threat has become a real possibility. As a result, a return to normal circulation in the Red Sea can be envisaged in the short term. In any case, even if only on environmental grounds, it is inevitable in the longer term.
As, after the overheating of freight rates caused by the Covid 19 pandemic, the main difficulty, no doubt, will be managing the transition. In 2022, the turnround in the market was sudden. To prepare for the next one, it could be a wise move today to aid the Egyptian state. Should we introduce a Suez support fee in the form of a levy of $10 or so per container transiting the canal as a mean of help the country in this particularly difficult period? The idea might seem strange and difficult to propose at a time when shippers are feeling the effect of higher freight rates, but we could also see it as an investment which will soften the impact of the shock to come.